<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 3 Reasons To Pirate Photoshop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/</link>
	<description>About The Arts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 21:45:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-87182</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 01:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/#comment-87182</guid>
		<description>This debate just made my day :D

You&#039;re all great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This debate just made my day <img src='http://kalaalog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You&#8217;re all great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buh</title>
		<link>http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-74515</link>
		<dc:creator>buh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 08:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/#comment-74515</guid>
		<description>But what would happen if I&#039;d borrow a copy from college/high school/ a friend and install it on my computer?

Would that make it less immoral? The copy had been paid for and I return it after I&#039;ve installed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what would happen if I&#8217;d borrow a copy from college/high school/ a friend and install it on my computer?</p>
<p>Would that make it less immoral? The copy had been paid for and I return it after I&#8217;ve installed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prince</title>
		<link>http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-71934</link>
		<dc:creator>Prince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/#comment-71934</guid>
		<description>I use pirated photoshop cs5,not only because I can&#039;t afford it but just don&#039;t have the means to buy it over here in Ghana in west Africa...its really serious how one can just download such a prized software via torrent. Over here in west Africa I think the Government even use pirated softwares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use pirated photoshop cs5,not only because I can&#8217;t afford it but just don&#8217;t have the means to buy it over here in Ghana in west Africa&#8230;its really serious how one can just download such a prized software via torrent. Over here in west Africa I think the Government even use pirated softwares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash</title>
		<link>http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-65745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/#comment-65745</guid>
		<description>Theo just basically worded my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theo just basically worded my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BTC</title>
		<link>http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-64477</link>
		<dc:creator>BTC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/#comment-64477</guid>
		<description>You know, I am so sick of major corporations re-writing our laws to suit their needs. I am even more sick of them imposing their skewed vision of morality upon us. Anyone who has attended college is guilty of the corporate definition of &quot;pirating.&quot; We have all taken books or articles written by other people, used them in our own papers (sometimes even directly quoted them), advanced from these materials, and the author had no capital gain. For his time, we stick his name in our citations. This is perfectly acceptable. If I were to pirate software and then attempt to sell copied versions to others, I would be in the wrong. But pirating for personal use is just some corporate invention designed to keep the coffers full and to prevent others from benefiting from intellectual property without forking over the cash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I am so sick of major corporations re-writing our laws to suit their needs. I am even more sick of them imposing their skewed vision of morality upon us. Anyone who has attended college is guilty of the corporate definition of &#8220;pirating.&#8221; We have all taken books or articles written by other people, used them in our own papers (sometimes even directly quoted them), advanced from these materials, and the author had no capital gain. For his time, we stick his name in our citations. This is perfectly acceptable. If I were to pirate software and then attempt to sell copied versions to others, I would be in the wrong. But pirating for personal use is just some corporate invention designed to keep the coffers full and to prevent others from benefiting from intellectual property without forking over the cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meh</title>
		<link>http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-57851</link>
		<dc:creator>Meh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 03:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/#comment-57851</guid>
		<description>Why the fuck not pirate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the fuck not pirate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CosmicCat</title>
		<link>http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-50702</link>
		<dc:creator>CosmicCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/#comment-50702</guid>
		<description>To sum up the arguments for piracy thus far:

1. I deserve the software 
(I don&#039;t have extra money, I am a student, I just like to tinker with fancy things cry cry cry)

2. The company doesn&#039;t deserve my money 
(entities that turn profits must be taking advantage of someone: equal and opposite reactions right? oh wait, that&#039;s physics! not business!...contrary to popular belief, it is possible for both parties in a sales transaction to benefit, and just because a company is &#039;big&#039; does not mean that it is inherently evil)

How about this twist? I have already paid for the software because I pay taxes! In turn, the local middle/high school shells out state funds (they  have to spend all that they can to appear needy so that they don&#039;t suffer budget cuts) to Adobe so that their software can indoctrinate students. All part of their strategy to corner the market by influencing next generation preferences. Collectively, we the masses have already made possible the furthering of Adobe&#039;s bottom line! Why shouldn&#039;t we enjoy a little slice of the software market we&#039;ve helped them corner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To sum up the arguments for piracy thus far:</p>
<p>1. I deserve the software<br />
(I don&#8217;t have extra money, I am a student, I just like to tinker with fancy things cry cry cry)</p>
<p>2. The company doesn&#8217;t deserve my money<br />
(entities that turn profits must be taking advantage of someone: equal and opposite reactions right? oh wait, that&#8217;s physics! not business!&#8230;contrary to popular belief, it is possible for both parties in a sales transaction to benefit, and just because a company is &#8216;big&#8217; does not mean that it is inherently evil)</p>
<p>How about this twist? I have already paid for the software because I pay taxes! In turn, the local middle/high school shells out state funds (they  have to spend all that they can to appear needy so that they don&#8217;t suffer budget cuts) to Adobe so that their software can indoctrinate students. All part of their strategy to corner the market by influencing next generation preferences. Collectively, we the masses have already made possible the furthering of Adobe&#8217;s bottom line! Why shouldn&#8217;t we enjoy a little slice of the software market we&#8217;ve helped them corner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plorpus</title>
		<link>http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-39309</link>
		<dc:creator>Plorpus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 23:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/#comment-39309</guid>
		<description>NOTE-
this is a question about pirating. even if you justify yourself by not being able to pay for the product because of the market, that does not change the moral value of it being wrong. however, if you have a moral reason, and do NOT use it commercially, for home purposes only, but you CAN pay for it (not having the money, but having the money and it not making a dent in your money) then that STILL doesnt make it right. if you can justify financially AND morally, then i think your alright. but of course, if by any chance adobe DOES come to your house, they wont think so...

look at this.

&quot;Hello know i know everything about limewire well ....... the fact this girl got fined £10000 for downloading of limewire and other p2p programs she had about 2 - 3 p2p programs INCLUDING LIMEWIRE and was fined for illegal downloading &quot;

thats tru, it was in the news. BUT theres also this.

&quot;I&#039;m going to post a blog on this myself, because as Tamara said, it might help to spread the news. I didn&#039;t read all of the comments (the first half I did) but here is a simple explanation on the laws and legal use of limewire.

1. Limewire is legal, fun, and COULD be safe (if not for viruses).

2. Downloading files from limewire such as music that you created, produced, and paid for yourself is fine. You can even allow others to download it. If a band, such as Hillsong, wanted to allow people to download their songs for free, thy could even use limewire to do so. It would not be illegal. Or, if I want to be able to share my report on ethics in Christianity with my friends, I can put it on limewire for them (and others) to download legally.

2. You do NOT own a song just because you bought the CD it is on. You have the right to listen to the song, but not distribute it. Other companies (like radios stations) have the right to boadcast the song, but they cannot sell it. And stores have the right to sell the song, but not necessarily broadcast it in their stores for everyone to listen. For the radio stations and stores, they must pay royalties to the actual owners of the songs so that they can continue playing the songs. Otherwise, it is illegal.

It is even illegal to play, sing, or do something with a song written by someone else in a concert or in like a church if you are not paying royalties for the act. Yes, though it is rare, Christian Musicians can come and sue a church if they play a song in their church during worship without having a license to do so.

There you have it...another answer from anotherguy&quot;

i think, therefore, that this dispute of copy rights will never end... EVER!

and that people will choose sides of the battle to be on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOTE-<br />
this is a question about pirating. even if you justify yourself by not being able to pay for the product because of the market, that does not change the moral value of it being wrong. however, if you have a moral reason, and do NOT use it commercially, for home purposes only, but you CAN pay for it (not having the money, but having the money and it not making a dent in your money) then that STILL doesnt make it right. if you can justify financially AND morally, then i think your alright. but of course, if by any chance adobe DOES come to your house, they wont think so&#8230;</p>
<p>look at this.</p>
<p>&#8220;Hello know i know everything about limewire well &#8230;&#8230;. the fact this girl got fined £10000 for downloading of limewire and other p2p programs she had about 2 &#8211; 3 p2p programs INCLUDING LIMEWIRE and was fined for illegal downloading &#8221;</p>
<p>thats tru, it was in the news. BUT theres also this.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m going to post a blog on this myself, because as Tamara said, it might help to spread the news. I didn&#8217;t read all of the comments (the first half I did) but here is a simple explanation on the laws and legal use of limewire.</p>
<p>1. Limewire is legal, fun, and COULD be safe (if not for viruses).</p>
<p>2. Downloading files from limewire such as music that you created, produced, and paid for yourself is fine. You can even allow others to download it. If a band, such as Hillsong, wanted to allow people to download their songs for free, thy could even use limewire to do so. It would not be illegal. Or, if I want to be able to share my report on ethics in Christianity with my friends, I can put it on limewire for them (and others) to download legally.</p>
<p>2. You do NOT own a song just because you bought the CD it is on. You have the right to listen to the song, but not distribute it. Other companies (like radios stations) have the right to boadcast the song, but they cannot sell it. And stores have the right to sell the song, but not necessarily broadcast it in their stores for everyone to listen. For the radio stations and stores, they must pay royalties to the actual owners of the songs so that they can continue playing the songs. Otherwise, it is illegal.</p>
<p>It is even illegal to play, sing, or do something with a song written by someone else in a concert or in like a church if you are not paying royalties for the act. Yes, though it is rare, Christian Musicians can come and sue a church if they play a song in their church during worship without having a license to do so.</p>
<p>There you have it&#8230;another answer from anotherguy&#8221;</p>
<p>i think, therefore, that this dispute of copy rights will never end&#8230; EVER!</p>
<p>and that people will choose sides of the battle to be on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theo</title>
		<link>http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-35300</link>
		<dc:creator>Theo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 06:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/#comment-35300</guid>
		<description>Just adding my two bits, I&#039;m currently studying graphic design and use an illegal copy of CS4 suit as do most of my classmates. In my opinion this is not a major problem for adobe because their money isn&#039;t being made from students and hobbyists. Where it actually helps adobe is that we become familiar and reliant on the software while we&#039;re students, ecouraging us to to purchase legal copies when we are working in the industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just adding my two bits, I&#8217;m currently studying graphic design and use an illegal copy of CS4 suit as do most of my classmates. In my opinion this is not a major problem for adobe because their money isn&#8217;t being made from students and hobbyists. Where it actually helps adobe is that we become familiar and reliant on the software while we&#8217;re students, ecouraging us to to purchase legal copies when we are working in the industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gagytman</title>
		<link>http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-34694</link>
		<dc:creator>Gagytman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 07:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalaalog.com/2007/07/19/top-3-reasons-to-priate-photoshop/#comment-34694</guid>
		<description>Why pirate software, for the same reason you buy generic drugs.

There is a lot in common with the big software companys and big pharma.

They both say there cost are for R&amp;D.
That&#039;s a bold faced lie!
From version 6.0 to version 7.0 execpt for a bell and a whistle and maby upgrade the interface a little,but honestly no real changes. They get Indian software devlopers for what maby $5 an hour? 

We all know that the obese prises go&#039;s strait to the pockets of the executives.

Its the same exuse as big pharma who also claims that R&amp;D justify chargeing $500 a pill for a cancer fighting drug, when we all know only pennys on the doller go to research. Apx. 95% of that money pads the wallets of there over paid executive waste and lobbyists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why pirate software, for the same reason you buy generic drugs.</p>
<p>There is a lot in common with the big software companys and big pharma.</p>
<p>They both say there cost are for R&amp;D.<br />
That&#8217;s a bold faced lie!<br />
From version 6.0 to version 7.0 execpt for a bell and a whistle and maby upgrade the interface a little,but honestly no real changes. They get Indian software devlopers for what maby $5 an hour? </p>
<p>We all know that the obese prises go&#8217;s strait to the pockets of the executives.</p>
<p>Its the same exuse as big pharma who also claims that R&amp;D justify chargeing $500 a pill for a cancer fighting drug, when we all know only pennys on the doller go to research. Apx. 95% of that money pads the wallets of there over paid executive waste and lobbyists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
